Lifecycle of Notes: My Implementation

This is a direct follow up to my previous discussion of the “strength of notes” and nurturing thought.

As with all aspects of a Creativity System, how you implement such a classification should differ based on your brain and creative goals. As a simple example: I believe that Jerry Seinfield uses two yellow legal pads… the first contains rough drafts of comedy material, and he migrates the “good ones” to a second for refinement. This is a rough classification system. In different episodes of LYT-house I’m pretty sure I have seen:

  • YAML frontmatter tag for epistemological status
  • Folders for “drafts” or “hypotheses”
  • Emoji in the filename like 🚧
  • empty nodes on the graph and #state/develop tags
  • completely separate forms/app/systems (e.g. Seinfield’s yellow legal pads)

These are so creative and are effective as identification… you just have to decide what works with your brain and goals… and steal it. 😈

I have written about my particular inputs and outputs. In the light of this my system uses different kinds of note, (the filename and structure) to signify the “strength” of an idea. The two main kinds of notes are:

  • “zettel”-style filenames for infant “weak” ideas and connecting thoughts (e.g.
  • “Evergreen” style named notes for strong facts and strong opinions (e.g. Boundary of the

This lifecycle kind of happened accidentally but it has stuck. In the many transitions of my system I tried 100% ZK style notes, and then migrated to Named Notes… but only for notes that had titles. This left a lot of my capture automations still creating ZK-style notes and created an organic difference between captured “ZK” style notes, and intentionally crafted evergreen Named Notes.


Before I get a letter… I know that these aren’t proper “zettelkasten” notes. They are just what I call them.

Zettels for me are the entry point into my note-taking system. Because they don’t have a name, folder, or categorization they can just enter the web at any point… cheap, easy capture.

Zettels (maybe I should come up with another name!) do abide by the note-making rules: a singular, atomic idea, in my voice, interesting to me… and they usually have at least one link to something else. They sometimes aren’t more complex than a single sentence.


Scripture Highlight

A single link to a verse and some comments from a sermon or personal study… usually unverified by further study:


In [[1 Kings-19#18|1 Kings 19:18]] God answers Elijah's [[Depression]] by telling him the truth: he's not alone. There are 7000 others.

God could have said "I am enough," or "don't be afraid," but instead comes with the whisper "you are not the last faithful person."
Book Note

A reflection on a book idea that I have not proven or become convinced of yet:


Bondage or enslaved is the biblical language for we commonly call addiction or addictive personalities today.

Lou Priolo. _[[Pleasing People]]_. P & R Publishing, 2006. p52

Commentary on another note that didn’t belong to that note’s singular idea:


Constraint-based programming as described by Bret Victor[^bv] is basically programming by [[Outcomes Over Outputs]].


A “label” on the “line” between two other notes. These are often made while exploring links… and I find one that I feel like future-me would need a little more context for how these relate or to connect a few things:


[[ESV/1 Chronicles/1 Chronicles-19#12|1 Chronicles 19:12]] reflects the idea of [[Distributed Command]], [[Simple]], and [[Cover and Move]] from [[Extreme Ownership by Jocko Willink]]

There’s a lot more that gets added as zettels:

  • sermon outlines
  • dream logs
  • random facts or user insights about the products in my day-job

Zettels make up the bulk of what gets captured into my system. It’s rare for me to enter a “strong” idea right out of the gate. Those “strong” ideas, (usually ones I’ve been holding for a long time) get entered as Named Notes.

Named Notes

Notes containing a strong opinion or strong fact become a Named Note or Evergreen Note. My ideas here are so influenced by Andy Mutaschak’s writing on Evergreen notes that you may as well open tab to his wild web of wisdom: Evergreen Notes - Andy Mutaschak.

A Named Note still follows the rules of atomicity, interestingness, and links… but it has a filename and title that is usable in a sentence and meaningful for me.


Filename: Journaling externalizes thoughts and

# Journaling externalizes thoughts and feelings

By externalizing the thoughts into words, we are able to separate our identity from the thoughts and feelings we are experiencing. This helps us be more objective and take every thought captive. 

You can see this pattern in the psalms. So many of them start with an experience or feeling that the psalmist describes… often in pathetic or visceral detail. Then the writer calms, and sets his will to worship and honor the Lord. 


- [[Simultaneous terror and peace]]. 
- [[booknotes/The Bullet Journal Method by Ryder Carroll]] talks a lot about becoming a witness to your own experience through rapid logging.

Choosing a good name is important. Names that could just be the name of a #tag (i.e. “Marriage”, “Agile Methodology”) are too generalized. These usually become hub notes or Maps of Content (as Nick Milo styles them.) If the name is usable in a sentence and meaningful to me, it helps me constrain the note to be singular.1 Instead of “Marriage” I have a note named “Living in an Understanding Way.” That’s a meaningful thought to me… and it might get split into “Give Myself Up For Her” and “Living in an Understanding Way” as the thoughts become more developed and need atomicity.

Form Dictates Workflow

Because my “weak notes” don’t have descriptive filenames, they are harder to “find.” They don’t jump out visually in the graph or in backlinks, but they are still present and available for exploration. The “label” style weak notes especially pique my interest when looking at a local graph… those are often great places to start discovering.

image of a local graph in obsidian

Occasionally while reviewing “weak” notes or zettels, I discover enough weak opinions to voltron into a strong fact or strong opinion. It’s always exciting. It feels like being able to watch my thoughts forming. Seeing and experiencing externally the process of thinking has helped me reject some of those new hypotheses without mindlessly accepting them just based on frequency2.

Workflow Example: Saul and Fear

An example of how all this all played together recently: making my way through 1 Samuel, I got to (one of the passages that amuses me the most) 1 Sam. 10:22:

So they inquired again of the LORD, “Is there a man still to come?” and the LORD said, “Behold, he has hidden himself among the baggage.” (ESV)

I laughed as I usually do at the thought of the giant future king of israel hiding under blankets among the donkeys and camels… and the thought occurred to me: Was Saul’s predominant failing Fear?

I jotted it into a zettel note, just a link to the Bible verse and a question:

Is Saul’s predominant sin fear?

Over the following weeks I continued to read about Saul, and logged six or more little notes on the same line of thought. As I noticed similarities, notes became linked. I started to notice that it wasn’t just fear, it was specifically linked to Saul’s fear of other’s opinion. I eventually rewrote and reshaped the notes into a new Evergreen form based on my strong opinion: Saul was Dominated by Fear.

# Saul was dominated by fear

Saul's prevailing [[Sin]] may have been [[Fear]], specifically fear of how people saw him. 

He displays fearfulness at the beginning of his story as comic humility[^1022], later in life it manifests as violent paranoia.[^paranoia]

Samuel tells Saul that he thought little of himself[^little]… I wonder what this means? Self-esteem? Certainly a self-focus rather than trusting God. Samuel attempts to redirect his attention to the fact God anointed him king.

Saul confesses to Samuel that he feared the people's opinion.[^opinion] As further evidence of this, we can point to his dramatic transformation when the people acclaim David above him.[^acclaim]

In his final chapter his fear of the Philistine army[^army] drives him to seek out necromancy. His fear kept him from eating, and paralyzes him with terror when ghost Samuel tells him the truth.

[^1022]:  [[ESV/1 Samuel/1 Samuel-10#22|1 Samuel 10:22]]
[^paranoia]:  [[ESV/1 Samuel/1 Samuel-18#12|1 Sam 18:12]], [[ESV/1 Samuel/1 Samuel-18#29|1 Sam 18:29]]
[^little]: [[1 Samuel-15#17|1 Sam 15:17]]
[^opinion]: [[ESV/1 Samuel/1 Samuel-15#24|1 Samuel 15:24]]
[^acclaim]: [[1 Samuel-18#8|1 Samuel 18:8]]
[^army]: [[1 Samuel-28#5|1 Samuel 28:5]]

I’m sure my style and form will continue to develop over time. I am really glad to have stumbled across this idea of Note Lifecycle. I continue to see a version of this thinking in other people’s Creativity Systems, and am stealing thinking about how to learn from them. 🤣

  1. This wonderful idea is completely stolen from the wonderful Andy Mutaschak’s note: Prefer note titles with complete phrases to sharpen claims 

  2. Appeal to numbers -